Subject: notes on my definition

From: "David Randall" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 22:14:49 -0500

I am that I am, apparently.

My definition owes something to a 'woola-woola boy', as defined by mark
helprin in _Winter's Tale_, which I was just reading.  Other than that,
nothing succeeds like excess.

Does this mean that I provide the next word, or does whoever came in second
do that?

David

P.S. 'Over-researched' indeed!