RUCERVINE results!

[Nicolas Ward]

On 5/3/07, Nora Munoz <noraemunoz at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in getting the results back to
> you.  I had fun putting together my first ever
> fictionary ballot.  I was concerend when two ballots
> came in that were very close to the actual definition,
> and I made the decision to let them stand on the
> assumption that the fictionariers didn't really know
> the definition and that it would confuse the rest of
> you!  (it sort of did...)  So thanks for a fun round,
> and I hope to attempt further play so I might actually
> have a chance to win again!

When the word was first submitted, I read it as rucer - vine, thinking
some kind of plant... and then later I remembered that cervine = deer.
Should I have canceled the round, or not submitted a definition?

--Nick

-- 
Nicolas Ward
617.230.9279

ultranurd at gmail.com
http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/~nward/

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a yo-yo."
-- Enoch Root, The Confusion, by Neal Stephenson