[Fictionary] reply-to?

[Hutch]

Until we get it figured out, everyone had better use Reply To All and
explicitly send to either fictionary at swarpa.net or to the individual
who sent the message.

BB,
Hutch

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/S d+>- s+:+ a+ C+++$ ULAC>$ P L+ !E W++$ N+ o K?
w++++$ O? M- !V PS+ PE- Y+ PGP- t++ 5? X-- R !tv? b++++>$
DI++++ D G+> e++ h+ r--?* y++>
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

On 4/4/08, Pierre Abbat <phma at phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> On Friday 04 April 2008 00:36, Jean-Joseph Cote wrote:
> > Looks like messages from me have the Reply-to field.  I think that has
> > nothing to do with the listserv settings, but rather with the settings
> > in my email program -- I have Reply-to set up because the actual email
> > account that this is coming from is jjcotedsl at verizon.net, and the MIT
> > address is just a forwarding dealie.  When I set up Thunderbird, it
> > seemed like I needed to do that in order to keep replies from going to
> > the verizon address, which I don't want anybody to ever use, because I
> > might change to a different provider at the drop of a hat.
>
> I compared Judith's message about the haboob with her last message that went
> through Plover. If I hit reply on the cell division message, it goes to her,
> but if I hit reply on the haboob message, it goes to the list. I looked at
> the headers, and it's not obvious why.
>
> Pierre