[Fictionary] "reply-to" headers

[Hutch]

That's what *I*m seeing. I had to change this e-mail from Elliott to the list.

BB,
Hutch

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/S d+>- s+:+ a+ C+++$ ULAC>$ P L+ !E W++$ N+ o K?
w++++$ O? M- !V PS+ PE- Y+ PGP- t++ 5? X-- R !tv? b++++>$
DI++++ D G+> e++ h+ r--?* y++>
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

On 4/6/08, eLLioTT morEton <emoreton at alum.swarthmore.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to take so long getting to this.  I can't see what the problem is, but
> then, I know nothing about Mailman.  Let me explain how the list's options
> are set, and then maybe someone more knowledgeable than I am can offer
> suggestions.  (I want to try solving it on-list before going to the
> swarpanet.org admins.)  Here are the relevant settings.  Current option is
> in ALL CAPS.  The current options have always been current, ever since the
> creation of the list.
>
> ``Should any existing Reply-To: header found in the original message be
> stripped? If so, this will be done regardless of whether an explict
> Reply-To: header is added by Mailman or not.''  Options:  YES, no
>
> ``Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is *strongly*
> recommended for most mailing lists.'' POSTER, This list, Explicit address.
>
> Do these settings correctly describe what Mailman is actually doing with
> this list?
>
> Thanks,
> em