[Fictionary] OWotD
Hutch
hutchinson.jeff at gmail.com
Sun Mar 31 18:58:36 EDT 2013
I never knew before that I am a resistentialist. I mean the behavior is
obvious: only the word for it is not.
I'm a little concerned by the definition of "soda-squirt". Do you think
they REALLY meant that it ONLY refers to soda jerks who happen to work in
New Mexico?
Finally, why "With Squirrel"? Does that mean that if a woman is pregnant
with twins she might be "With Moose and Squirrel"?
Finally, don't think I'm zafty, but I'm working on the results.
BB,
Hutch
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/S d+>- s+:+ a++ C+++$ ULAC>$ P+ L+ !E W++$
N+ o K? w++++/--$ O? M- V? PS+ PE/- Y PGP- t++ 5?
X-- R !tv? b++++>$ DI++++ D G+> e++ h+ r--?* y++>
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Ranjit Bhatnagar <ranjit at moonmilk.com>wrote:
> Here's another in that vein:
>
>
> http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/195348/18-obsolete-words-which-should-have-never-gone-out-of-style/
>
>
> On Saturday, March 30, 2013, lindafowens at netzero.com wrote:
>
>> Sounds like a Biblical day in which the Earth was made, with six "days"
>> required. Linda PS Or so our Biblical myth would explain.
>>
>>
>>
>> arpa.net
>> Subject: Re: [Fictionary] OWotD
>> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:29:52 -0400
>>
>> "of the Day", hmm? Six words in the first two weeks, another two years
>> later, and then nothing in the two-plus years since? This is like the
>> pitch-drop experiment.
>>
>> J-J
>>
>> On 3/28/2013 8:13 PM, Jim Moskowitz wrote:
>> > You'd think a blog called Obsolete Word of the Day would be a fabulous
>> > find for us fictioneers. And it would be, if only it had more then
>> > seven entries in the four years it's been in existence.
>> >
>> > Oh well, here it is anyway: http://obsoleteword.blogspot.com/
>> >
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.swarpa.net/pipermail/fictionary/attachments/20130331/fc0c08bc/attachment.html
More information about the Fictionary
mailing list