No, really -- dogs
Jean-Joseph Cote
jjcote at juno.com
Tue Oct 2 19:48:45 EDT 2001
>Before the introduction of jacks, spits for cooking were
>turned either by dogs trained for the purpose, or by lads
>kept by the family, or hired as occasions arose, to turn
>the spit or broach.
>
>-- James Halliwell's Dictionary of Archaisms and
>Provincialisms, 1855
Perhaps. Or maybe Mr Halliwell also misunderstood this definition, and
proceeded to imaginatively elaborate on it. It wouldn't be the only such
example in the history of dictionaries.
Jean-Joseph
More information about the Fictionary
mailing list