No, really -- dogs
Ranjit Bhatnagar
ranjit at moonmilk.com
Tue Oct 2 20:50:01 EDT 2001
J-J:
> Perhaps. Or maybe Mr Halliwell also misunderstood this definition, and
> proceeded to imaginatively elaborate on it. It wouldn't be the only such
> example in the history of dictionaries.
>From http://www.clanntartan.org/articles/hearth.html
Meat spits could be turned by hand, or by devices called
spit-jacks. A rope was run from the wheel on the spit to the
jack. Some jacks were wound like clocks: "clockwork
jacks". Other spit-jacks had fan-like paddles inside the
chimney and the rising heat and smoke turned the
paddies. This type was called (you guessed it) a
smoke-jack. However, the best example I found for a
spit-jack ran on dog power. A dog was placed in a
hamster-style wheel near the ceiling. The dog would turn the
wheel and ropes and pulleys would turn the spit. This was a
common enough practice that articles were even written about
the best breeds of dogs to use.
http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/glenimaalterrier.htm
Unlike Lakeland Terriers and Fox Terriers, the Glen of Imaal
is supposed to work silently. It may also have been used for
dog fighting entertainment and to turn spits cooking meats
over a fire by trotting on a treadmill for hours at a time.
I want one of those dogs!
-- ranjit
ps. have you earned YOUR Teastas Misneach?
More information about the Fictionary
mailing list